Hisotry of Pedestrian Reflector use in Finland
The
following information comes from
Matti
Koivurova of the Central Organization for Traffic Safety in Finland. He is possibly
the world’s leading expert on pedestrian reflectors.
Translated
by Kim Pasanen:
In the
late 1950s, reflective materials began to appear in the Finnish market.
These were sewn or glued onto clothing. Manufacturers of automotive
reflectors began making pedestrian reflectors as well. In the 1960s,
Swedish Professors of Psychology Johansson and Rumar at the University of
Uppsala conducted measurements of reflector effectiveness with regard to
distance in the context of visibility to motorists.
In the
1960s, municipalities and states in Finland campaigned for pedestrian
reflector use and held competitions for this that proved effective.
Toward the late ‘60s, reflector use in rural areas was up to about 40%.
In 1970,
performance standards were set for reflectors to combat makers of fake
look-alike products that were appearing on the market. Reflector
attachments of various kinds for clothing, footwear, gloves, hats and
backpacks were developed in the ‘70s. Official standards for pedestrian
reflectors were established in Finland in the late 70’s.
In 1982 a
law went into effect in the traffic code (42§) that reads “pedestrians
traveling unlit roads after dark other than sidewalks or bicycle paths
must generally wear an appropriate reflector.” No penalty was imposed for
failure to comply.
The
Nordic countries established universal standards for pedestrian reflectors
in the 1980s. In the ‘90s the European Union countries began to adopt
standards for PPE (personal protective equipment) such as helmets and
other devices. The PPE Directive included standards for high-visibility
warning clothing and for pedestrian reflectors (EN 13356 Visibility
Accessories for Non-professional Use). On January 1, 2003, 42§ was
modified to read “pedestrians traveling roads after dark must generally
wear an appropriate reflector.” Now it includes lit as well as unlit
areas, because street lighting is usually weak. There is still no penalty
for non-compliance.